From 96f5fec5242cc2a1e451ad6402bd4a4f6fb9b257 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abdelrazak Younes <younes@lyx.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:29:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Code simplification.

git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@31523 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
---
 src/LyXFunc.cpp | 16 +---------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/LyXFunc.cpp b/src/LyXFunc.cpp
index fe5f514849..024fdb14e7 100644
--- a/src/LyXFunc.cpp
+++ b/src/LyXFunc.cpp
@@ -162,27 +162,13 @@ FuncStatus LyXFunc::getStatus(FuncRequest const & cmd) const
 		return flag;
 	}
 
-	switch (cmd.action) {
-	case LFUN_UNKNOWN_ACTION:
+	if (cmd.action == LFUN_UNKNOWN_ACTION) {
 		flag.unknown(true);
 		flag.setEnabled(false);
-		break;
-
-	default:
-		break;
-	}
-
-	if (flag.unknown()) {
 		flag.message(from_utf8(N_("Unknown action")));
 		return flag;
 	}
 
-	if (!flag.enabled()) {
-		if (flag.message().empty())
-			flag.message(from_utf8(N_("Command disabled")));
-		return flag;
-	}
-
 	// I would really like to avoid having this switch and rather try to
 	// encode this in the function itself.
 	// -- And I'd rather let an inset decide which LFUNs it is willing
-- 
2.39.2