From 1b123c02005d7c1a1f3f934938f91489530c3101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thibaut Cuvelier Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 22:44:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] DocBook: improve AAS support. --- .../docbook/bibliography_precooked_aastex.xml | 236 +++++++++++++----- lib/layouts/aastex.layout | 2 + lib/layouts/aastex6.layout | 3 +- 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) diff --git a/autotests/export/docbook/bibliography_precooked_aastex.xml b/autotests/export/docbook/bibliography_precooked_aastex.xml index d3381b3afb..baadbc0792 100644 --- a/autotests/export/docbook/bibliography_precooked_aastex.xml +++ b/autotests/export/docbook/bibliography_precooked_aastex.xml @@ -10,61 +10,81 @@
Observations -All our observations were short direct exposures with CCD's. At Lick Observatory we used a TI 500\times +All our observations were short direct exposures with CCD's. At Lick Observatory we used a TI 500 +\times × - 500 chip and a GEC 575\times + +500 chip and a GEC 575 +\times × - 385, on the 1-m Nickel reflector. The only filter available at Lick was red. At CTIO we used a GEC 575\times + +385, on the 1-m Nickel reflector. The only filter available at Lick was red. At CTIO we used a GEC 575 +\times × - 385, with B,V, + +385, with +B,V, B,V, - and R + + and +R R - filters, and an RCA 512\times + + filters, and an RCA 512 +\times × - 320, with U,B,V,R, + +320, with +U,B,V,R, U,B,V,R, - and I + + and +I I - filters, on the 1.5-m reflector. In the CTIO observations we tried to concentrate on the shortest practicable wavelengths; but faintness, reddening, and poor short-wavelength sensitivity often kept us from observing in U + + filters, on the 1.5-m reflector. In the CTIO observations we tried to concentrate on the shortest practicable wavelengths; but faintness, reddening, and poor short-wavelength sensitivity often kept us from observing in +U U - or even in B + + or even in +B B - . All four cameras had scales of the order of 0.4 arcsec/pixel, and our field sizes were around 3 arcmin. + +. All four cameras had scales of the order of 0.4 arcsec/pixel, and our field sizes were around 3 arcmin. The CCD images are unfortunately not always suitable, for very poor clusters or for clusters with large cores. Since the latter are easily studied by other means, we augmented our own CCD profiles by collecting from the literature a number of star-count profiles , , , , as well as photoelectric profiles , and electronographic profiles . In a few cases we judged normality by eye estimates on one of the Sky Surveys.
@@ -74,7 +94,8 @@
Formalism -A tree-level amplitude in e^{+}e^{-} +A tree-level amplitude in +e^{+}e^{-} @@ -93,7 +114,9 @@ - collisions can be expressed in terms of fermion strings of the form \bar{v}(p_{2},\sigma_{2})P_{-\tau}\hat{a}_{1}\hat{a}_{2}\cdots\hat{a}_{n}u(p_{1},\sigma_{1}), + + collisions can be expressed in terms of fermion strings of the form +\bar{v}(p_{2},\sigma_{2})P_{-\tau}\hat{a}_{1}\hat{a}_{2}\cdots\hat{a}_{n}u(p_{1},\sigma_{1}), @@ -178,17 +201,23 @@ , - where p + + where +p p - and \sigma + + and +\sigma σ - label the initial e^{\pm} + + label the initial +e^{\pm} @@ -199,7 +228,9 @@ - four-momenta and helicities (\sigma=\pm1) + + four-momenta and helicities +(\sigma=\pm1) ( @@ -209,7 +240,9 @@ ) - , \hat{a}_{i}=a_{i}^{\mu}\gamma_{\nu} + +, +\hat{a}_{i}=a_{i}^{\mu}\gamma_{\nu} @@ -240,7 +273,9 @@ - and P_{\tau}=\frac{1}{2}(1+\tau\gamma_{5}) + + and +P_{\tau}=\frac{1}{2}(1+\tau\gamma_{5}) @@ -270,7 +305,9 @@ - is a chirality projection operator (\tau=\pm1) + + is a chirality projection operator +(\tau=\pm1) ( @@ -280,7 +317,9 @@ ) - . The a_{i}^{\mu} + +. The +a_{i}^{\mu} @@ -293,26 +332,34 @@ - may be formed from particle four-momenta, gauge-boson polarization vectors or fermion strings with an uncontracted Lorentz index associated with final-state fermions. + + may be formed from particle four-momenta, gauge-boson polarization vectors or fermion strings with an uncontracted Lorentz index associated with final-state fermions. Figures 1 and 2 should appear side-by-side in print -In the chiral representation the \gamma +In the chiral representation the +\gamma γ - matrices are expressed in terms of 2\times2 + + matrices are expressed in terms of +2\times2 2×2 - Pauli matrices \sigma + + Pauli matrices +\sigma σ - and the unit matrix 1 as \gamma^{\mu} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc} + + and the unit matrix 1 as +\gamma^{\mu} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & \sigma_{+}^{\mu}\\ \sigma_{-}^{\mu} & 0 \end{array}\right),\gamma^{5}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} @@ -420,7 +467,9 @@ - giving \hat{a}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} + + giving +\hat{a}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & (\hat{a})_{+}\\ (\hat{a})_{-} & 0 \end{array}\right),(\hat{a})_{\pm}=a_{\mu}\sigma_{\pm}^{\mu}, @@ -496,11 +545,15 @@ , - The spinors are expressed in terms of two-component Weyl spinors as u=\left(\begin{array}{c} + + The spinors are expressed in terms of two-component Weyl spinors as +u=\left(\begin{array}{c} (u)_{-}\\ (u)_{+} -\end{array}\right),v={\textbf{(}}\vdag_{+}{\textbf{,}}\vdag_{-}{\textbf{)}}.MathML export failed. Please report this as a bug. -The Weyl spinors are given in terms of helicity eigenstates \chi_{\lambda}(p) +\end{array}\right),v={\textbf{(}}\vdag_{+}{\textbf{,}}\vdag_{-}{\textbf{)}}.MathML export failed. Please report this as a bug. + +The Weyl spinors are given in terms of helicity eigenstates +\chi_{\lambda}(p) @@ -516,16 +569,20 @@ - with \lambda=\pm1 + + with +\lambda=\pm1 λ=±1 - by + + by -u(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & (E\pm\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi_{\lambda}(p),\\ + +u(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & (E\pm\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi_{\lambda}(p),\\ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi_{-\lambda}(p) @@ -612,13 +669,15 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - + +
Floating material and so forth -Consider a task that computes profile parameters for a modified Lorentzian of the form I=\frac{1}{1+d_{1}^{P(1+d_{2})}} +Consider a task that computes profile parameters for a modified Lorentzian of the form +I=\frac{1}{1+d_{1}^{P(1+d_{2})}} @@ -654,7 +713,9 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - where d_{1}=\sqrt{\left(\begin{array}{c} + + where +d_{1}=\sqrt{\left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{x_{1}}{R_{maj}}\end{array}\right)^{2}+\left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{y_{1}}{R_{min}}\end{array}\right)^{2}} @@ -737,9 +798,13 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - d_{2}=\sqrt{\left(\begin{array}{c} + + +d_{2}=\sqrt{\left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{x_{1}}{PR_{maj}}\end{array}\right)^{2}+\left(\begin{array}{c} -\case{y_{1}}{PR_{min}}\end{array}\right)^{2}}MathML export failed. Please report this as a bug.x_{1}=(x-x_{0})\cos\Theta+(y-y_{0})\sin\Theta +\case{y_{1}}{PR_{min}}\end{array}\right)^{2}}MathML export failed. Please report this as a bug. + +x_{1}=(x-x_{0})\cos\Theta+(y-y_{0})\sin\Theta @@ -774,7 +839,9 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi sinΘ - y_{1}=-(x-x_{0})\sin\Theta+(y-y_{0})\cos\Theta + + +y_{1}=-(x-x_{0})\sin\Theta+(y-y_{0})\cos\Theta @@ -809,8 +876,10 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi cosΘ - -In these expressions x_{0} + + +In these expressions +x_{0} @@ -821,7 +890,9 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - ,y_{0} + +, +y_{0} @@ -832,17 +903,23 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - is the star center, and \Theta + + is the star center, and +\Theta Θ - is the angle with the x + + is the angle with the +x x - axis. Results of this task are shown in table . It is not clear how these sorts of analyses may affect determination of M_{\text{\sun}} + + axis. Results of this task are shown in table . It is not clear how these sorts of analyses may affect determination of +M_{\text{\sun}} @@ -855,7 +932,9 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - , but the assumption is that the alternate results should be less than 90° out of phase with previous values. We have no observations of . Roughly \nicefrac{4}{5} + +, but the assumption is that the alternate results should be less than 90° out of phase with previous values. We have no observations of . Roughly +\nicefrac{4}{5} @@ -866,8 +945,9 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - of the electronically submitted abstracts for AAS meetings are error-free. -We are grateful to V. Barger, T. Han, and R. J. N. Phillips for doing the math in section . More information on the AASTeX macros package are available at http://www.aas.org/publications/aastex or the AAS ftp site. + + of the electronically submitted abstracts for AAS meetings are error-free. +We are grateful to V. Barger, T. Han, and R. J. N. Phillips for doing the math in section . More information on the AASTeX macros package are available at http://www.aas.org/publications/aastex or the AAS ftp site. IRAF, AIPS, Astropy, ... @@ -895,7 +975,8 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi Star Height - d_{x} + +d_{x} @@ -906,8 +987,10 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - - d_{y} + + + +d_{y} @@ -918,14 +1001,18 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - - n + + + +n n - - \chi^{2} + + + +\chi^{2} @@ -936,8 +1023,10 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - - R_{maj} + + + +R_{maj} @@ -950,8 +1039,10 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - - R_{min} + + + +R_{min} @@ -964,14 +1055,18 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - -P + + + +P P - a - PR_{maj} + +a + +PR_{maj} @@ -986,8 +1081,10 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - - PR_{min} + + + +PR_{min} @@ -1002,13 +1099,16 @@ v(p,\lambda)_{\pm} & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\textbf{p}}|)^{1/2}\chi - -\Theta + + + +\Theta Θ - b + +b Ref. diff --git a/lib/layouts/aastex.layout b/lib/layouts/aastex.layout index 866c88f28d..275018a83c 100644 --- a/lib/layouts/aastex.layout +++ b/lib/layouts/aastex.layout @@ -334,6 +334,8 @@ Style Acknowledgements Size Normal Shape Italic EndFont + DocBookTag para + DocBookWrapperTag acknowledgement End diff --git a/lib/layouts/aastex6.layout b/lib/layouts/aastex6.layout index 1c6054a717..52c38be126 100644 --- a/lib/layouts/aastex6.layout +++ b/lib/layouts/aastex6.layout @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ Style Software LabelFont Shape Italic EndFont - DocBookTag application + DocBookWrapperTag para + DocBookTag application End # other new commands are mainly for the user preamble -- 2.39.2