From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgouttes@lyx.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:19:56 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: bug 2172: buffer not marked dirty after LFUN_CUT
X-Git-Tag: 1.6.10~13736
X-Git-Url: https://git.lyx.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b166c7d8427c0873c0834004f4edab56489145f;p=lyx.git

bug 2172: buffer not marked dirty after LFUN_CUT


git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@10678 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
---

diff --git a/src/ChangeLog b/src/ChangeLog
index c4ec81f303..4ea6cc06fe 100644
--- a/src/ChangeLog
+++ b/src/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2005-12-22  Jean-Marc Lasgouttes  <lasgouttes@lyx.org>
+
+	* lyxfunc.C (dispatch): do not call getStatus again to determine
+	whether a lfun is disabled (bug 2172).
+
 2005-12-19  Jean-Marc Lasgouttes  <lasgouttes@lyx.org>
 
 	* cursor.C (macroModeClose): set the cursor inside the new math
diff --git a/src/lyxfunc.C b/src/lyxfunc.C
index 23c7a5f2ea..b204a70900 100644
--- a/src/lyxfunc.C
+++ b/src/lyxfunc.C
@@ -1592,10 +1592,9 @@ void LyXFunc::dispatch(FuncRequest const & cmd)
 				view()->update(Update::FitCursor);
 
 			// if we executed a mutating lfun, mark the buffer as dirty
-			// FIXME: Why not use flag.enabled() but call getStatus again?
-			if (getStatus(cmd).enabled()
-					&& !lyxaction.funcHasFlag(cmd.action, LyXAction::NoBuffer)
-					&& !lyxaction.funcHasFlag(cmd.action, LyXAction::ReadOnly))
+			if (flag.enabled()
+			    && !lyxaction.funcHasFlag(cmd.action, LyXAction::NoBuffer)
+			    && !lyxaction.funcHasFlag(cmd.action, LyXAction::ReadOnly))
 				view()->buffer()->markDirty();
 		}