Amend 761a542551bc9 once more.

As it is designed now, Static label is the only case that makes sense.

diff --git a/src/RowPainter.cpp b/src/RowPainter.cpp
index 86ddb30f3bf976a72e608fee1ed13ecfb29b78a7..3b4c76b6c6a0125b822ee1dd905a3ec718697a7b 100644 (file)
--- a/src/RowPainter.cpp
+++ b/src/RowPainter.cpp
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ void RowPainter::paintDepthBar() const
 
        // We also mark follow-up paragraphs in a paragraph group
        if (par_.layout().isParagraphGroup()
-           && par_.layout().labeltype != LABEL_NO_LABEL
+           && par_.layout().labeltype == LABEL_STATIC
            && !text_.isFirstInSequence(row_.pit()))
                ++depth;
 
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void RowPainter::paintDepthBar() const
                prev_depth = pars_[pit2].getDepth();
                // We also mark follow-up paragraphs in a paragraph group
                if (pars_[pit2].layout().isParagraphGroup()
-                   && pars_[pit2].layout().labeltype != LABEL_NO_LABEL
+                   && pars_[pit2].layout().labeltype == LABEL_STATIC
                    && !text_.isFirstInSequence(pit2))
                        ++prev_depth;
        }
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ void RowPainter::paintDepthBar() const
                next_depth = pars_[pit2].getDepth();
                // We also mark follow-up paragraphs in a paragraph group
                if (pars_[pit2].layout().isParagraphGroup()
-                   && pars_[pit2].layout().labeltype != LABEL_NO_LABEL
+                   && pars_[pit2].layout().labeltype == LABEL_STATIC
                    && !text_.isFirstInSequence(pit2))
                        ++next_depth;
        }