!! - mark "not a bug, a feature" replies, usually with a request for
further discussion
+ pp - partially fixed
+
Unmarked items are known unfixed but probably unverified bugs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- plain ASCII text please, not much more than 70 chars per column
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
Dekel:
-Array/eqnarray
-
-// - Ctrl+enter doesn't work
-
-// - When creating a matrix/align/eqnarray all columns are centered.
-
-
-Macros:
-
-?? - When changing the macro definition, all instances are not updated.
-
-:: I cannot reproduce this.
-
-?? - If I have macros \newcommand{\foo}[1]{[#1]} and
-?? \newcommand{\foox}{\foo{x}} then when an instance of \foox is drawn on
-?? screen, there are two black frames. While this is "correct", it is
-?? annoying.
-
-:: This is partially fixed?
-
-- LyX crashes when you define a recursive macro
-
-Misc:
-
-- If I have x_{1}^{2}, I put the cursor before the 2, and press backspace,
- the result is 'x2'. The correct result should be 'x_{1}2'
-
-- If I mark some text and then press ^, then the marked text is deleted.
- The correct behavior is to put the marked text in the superscript.
-
-- Pressing <down> when cursor is in subscript will move the cursor up
- (to the base of the subscript) instead of exiting the inset.
- The same problem happen in fractions
-
-!! If you type something there you will see that the corsor has left the
-!! inset. That's mor or less a "feature". If you don't like it, propose a
-!! method how a subscript inset can figure out what is "optically" lower
-!! on screen.
-
-// - When you press the mouse just to the left of the middle point of
-// some char, the cursor will be positioned to the right of the char.
-
-- It is possible to put two or more consecutive spaces in math text mode
-
-// - Text in superscript is not smaller than normal text.
-
-?? - After insertion of \sum, the cursor is in invalid location
-?? There is still a problem when doing c-m \sum S-C-M
-
-?? - The height of the frame is often wrong (e.g. x^2)
-?? For example $\sum x$ in an inline formula
-
- InsetFormula::validate is broken
-// - Changing math space length by pressing the space-bar key doesn't work
-!! it's M-m space now.
-
-- The drawing of decorations on screen is very different than latex.
- (a low priority bug).
-
-- If I change '\alpha' to bold, the result is \mathbf{a}
-
-- Just moving the cursor in a math inset causes changing the buffer status
- to (changed).
-
Eran Tromer:
-- When exiting the formula during selection, the anchor moves to the
- left of the formula and there's no way to go back.
-
-// - Scripts are too large. $\log_2$ exceeds inset frame (non-displayed).
-
-- You need two <right> to get past \vec{v}, and all sort of other
- insetish behavior.
-
-- \vec{several-characters} doesn't work. \overrightarrow does.
-
-- When the cursor is in a subscript (and either isn't at the end of
- the subscript or there's no subsubscript), pressing <down> should
- try to *really* go down (to the next line, or denumerator, or
- whatever). Currently it goes *up*. Ditto for superscripts.
-
-:: Please see comment to Dekel's report on the same problem.
-
-// - When choosing to insert "\left\Vert \right\Vert" parenthesis using
-// the maths [sic] panel, a "\left( \right." is inserted instead.
-
- - Formula inside tabular cell: red frame of cell inset and purple
- frame of formula can overlap, causing leftovers when leaving
- formula. To get an example, insert a 1x1 tabular into a new document,
- enter the cell its cell and press
- M-m ( M-f 1 <right> <right> <right> (zoom=100, screenDPI=100)
-
-- When selecting multiple cells in a array using the keyboard, <left>
- etc. should can move whole cell at a time -- no need to navigate
- within cells.
- When selecting, maybe give a visual indication of the "original"
anchor, when it differs from the "actual" one.
-// - C-v always pastes into the end of the current math inset, instead of
-// the cursor location.
-
-- Placement of cursor using mouse is seriously broken.
- Example 1: large fractions.
- Example 2: type into a new document:
- "M-d xxxxxxxxx <right> M-x footnote-insert"
- Can't reach most places in the formula using mouse.
-
-
-
Rainer Dorsch:
-- Entering \mathbf{c} in math mode is displayed as written (without
- backslash)
+- I know the latex code of a lot of math symbols displayed by lyx,
+ but not all of them. Thus I have to use the math panel for only a single
+ symbol in a formula. I think it would be very useful, if the latex code
+ of the symbol would be displayed as a hint, if the mouse positioned over
+ it.
Marcus (Suran@gmx.net)
-// - In math-mode I can switch back to text-mode in a formula but then I am
-// not able to type Umlauts.
-
-?? - Having selected some part of a formula and creating a fraction with that
-?? part in the top my selection-buffer is replaced with the part.
+- In math-mode I can switch back to text-mode in a formula but then I am
+ not able to type Umlauts.
- If the math-panel has the focus I can type text but not switch into
math-mode or use some of the other keyboard-shortcuts.
-- In the default-configuration there are shortcuts for al greek characters
- _except_ varphi wich is used extensively as a default-variable-name.
-
From: Álvaro Tejero Cantero <alvaro@antalia.com>
-- the most annoying bug by far: bold is "inherited" to super and subscripts.
-
-- when you get into equation array mode, the previous equation(s) remain(s)
- unaligned. I would be soo much faster to have LyX pick the last equal sign
- from the previous line as a reference for the alignment (and a good heuristic
- for the 80% of cases, with the advantage that we don't lose anything
- enforcing it). This is another case that slows down a lot when typing
- because, as the previous one, requires going back and correcting.
-
-- the movement is sometimes clumsy inside this arrayed equations: ie. C-a (or
- "home" are understood as "beginning of the formula" instead of "beginning of
- the equation". Again, a lot of movement has to be made. I suggest mapping
- "beginning of doc" with "beginning of formula" and so on (very intuitive), in
- case you don't deem appropriate the "namespace idea" below.
-
-//- movement between macro boxes is also weird, but in this one it's perhaps
-// just me.
-
- I suggest creating a different "kewybinding namespace" for the formulas,
since you could put to good use all those keybindings from the menu (M-?,
C-?) thath currently do their job PLUS getting you out of the formula.
majority of cases.
-- undo-redo seems too coarse in math-mode. You end up losing substantial
- fragments of your formula. I hate that when it affects tensors,;).
-
- cut&paste inside math-mode doesn't work the X fashion (middle button doesn't
paste anything).
won't repeat that. Only that the flattening option would be then easier to
implement on top of that.
-- There's something I keep wondering about.. how do new math symbols get into
- LyX. Do they get ever?. I don't know if it can be done, but if you tell me
- where to "draw" those symbols or how, I would very glad start doing it. LyX
- deserves to have support (visual support) for all the AMSTeX constructs. But
- there must be something structural going on there, because otherwise more
- math symbols would be ready by now.. just a thought.
-
- Some math symbols aren't very well supported (to my knowledge). I'm
- thinking of underbraces with extra data in them,or [] options.
-
-
-Herbert Voss:
-
-- it's not possible to enter superscript when the
- ^-char works as a dead key. with the second ^-
- or the space the cursor jumps outside the mathbox.
-
+ thinking of [] options.
Jules Bean:
-
-- I've been using Lyx for a year or two now, and I have some thoughts on
- improving the interface. Not the GUI, as such, but the basic Human-Machine
- interface --- the efficiency with which I can enter information into it.
-
-There are a couple of general principles I'm try to uphold here:
-
a) If something's easy & quick in LaTeX then it should be easy & quick in
LyX (unless it really isn't very common). b) Actions which are used
frequently should be a single key-press, even if that's not very easy to
mnemonic -- easy to remember -- even if they are multiple keypresses.
Things you do rarely you care less about the time it takes to perform.
-2) Math-mode entry Under the xemacs keybindings, which I use, (damn it,
-I don't want to confuse my poor muscle memory more than necessary by
-learning too many different bindings for the same actions), the key
-sequence to enter math-mode is 'M-c m'. I'm not sure exactly what to
-propose instead, but I really think this needs to be only one keypress.
-
As an aside, you may think that I'm whining over nothing. However, when
you enter math mode as often as I do (often more than once a sentence) it
gets very annoying, especially as compared to simply typing '$' in plain
as acceptable before, but consistency would be nice ;-) IMO, self-inverse
would be best for both.
-4) ERT in math-mode
-
-Math-mode doesn't handle ERT very well at all. It flips back out of
-TeX-mode as soon as you type any special character. Very annoying if I
-wish to typeset an \xymatrix inside math-mode (see also my comment above
-about table-like environments), since I can't type the &. In fact, my
-xymatrices end up as $$\xymatrix{..}$$ in text-mode ERT. Also rather
-annoying when you want to use a \macro with more than one argument (but not
-fatally so).
-
5) Proposal : a 'ligatures' or 'autocorrect' system
One of the very minor, but useful, features of TeX is the way it lets you
among others... (selected via validate()?)
-Jean-Marc:
-
-> \def\neq{\not=} \let\ne=\neq
-> \let\le=\leq
-> \let\ge=\geq
-> \let\owns=\ni
-> \let\gets=\leftarrow
-> \let\to=\rightarrow
-> % \let\@@sqrt\sqrtsign
-> \let\|=\Vert
-
Angus:
- make math lables editable