cosmetics; compile fix

[features.git] / src / frontends / qt4 / TocWidget.cpp

diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/TocWidget.cpp b/src/frontends/qt4/TocWidget.cpp
index 05501f16e96ec062c16603f3faf40a59060751c3..eb3fc493314bdcff8b4d1af1fdd177632371a736 100644 (file)
--- a/src/frontends/qt4/TocWidget.cpp
+++ b/src/frontends/qt4/TocWidget.cpp
@@ -90,17 +90,18 @@ void TocWidget::on_updateTB_clicked()
        gui_view_.tocModels().updateBackend();
 }
 
+
 /* FIXME (Ugras 17/11/06):
-I have implemented a getIndexDepth function to get the model indices. In my
+I have implemented a indexDepth function to get the model indices. In my
 opinion, somebody should derive a new qvariant class for tocModelItem
-which saves the string data and depth information. that will save the
-depth calculation.
-*/
-int TocWidget::getIndexDepth(QModelIndex const & index, int depth)
+which saves the string data and depth information. That will save the
+depth calculation.  */
+
+static int indexDepth(QModelIndex const & index, int depth = -1)
 {
        ++depth;
-       return (index.parent() == QModelIndex())
-               ? depth : getIndexDepth(index.parent(),depth);
+       return index.parent() == QModelIndex()
+               ? depth : indexDepth(index.parent(), depth);
 }
 
 
@@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ void TocWidget::setTreeDepth(int depth)
        int size = indices.size();
        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
                QModelIndex index = indices[i];
-               tocTV->setExpanded(index, getIndexDepth(index) < depth_);
+               tocTV->setExpanded(index, indexDepth(index) < depth_);
        }
 }