XHTML output for InsetInclude.

[lyx.git] / development / HTML / HTML.notes

diff --git a/development/HTML/HTML.notes b/development/HTML/HTML.notes
index 7f8a77a28146db09350b05a9aec60239fdda1184..2bc429a07945edc1654df97d08ace85bd0891e7d 100644 (file)
--- a/development/HTML/HTML.notes
+++ b/development/HTML/HTML.notes
@@ -14,21 +14,27 @@ Known issues:
 
 These insets are basically done, though there are probably issues here and there,
        and there are even some FIXMEs:
-       Bibitem, Branch, Caption, Collapsable, Footnote, Hyperlink, Info, Label, Line, 
-       Listings, Marginal, Note, Newline, Newpage, Quotes, Space, SpecialChar, Wrap
+       Bibitem, Branch, Caption, Collapsable, Footnote, Hyperlink, Include, Info, 
+       Label, Line,  Listings, Marginal, Note, Newline, Newpage, Quotes, Space, 
+       SpecialChar, Wrap
 
 These insets do nothing for XHTML:
        ERT, OptArg, Phantom
 
 These insets work but still need work:
-       InsetBibtex: There are a few issues here. One is that the output is not very
-               nice. This will be solved, though, by a patch of mine I seem to have forgotten
-               to finish. To get output that accorded with the BibTeX style, of course, we'd 
-               have to parse the bbl file. I don't know if that's worth it.
-               Another issue concerns cross-references. At the moment, we simply use the
-               xref information for every entry, rather than listing the xref separately and
-               then referencing it. That should not be terribly hard, but it would take a bit
-               of work.
+       InsetBibtex: There are a few issues here. 
+               - One is that the output is not very nice. This will be solved, though, by 
+                       a patch of mine I seem to have forgotten to finish. To get output that 
+                       accorded with the BibTeX style, of course, we'd have to parse the bbl file. 
+                       I don't know if that's worth it.
+               - Another issue concerns cross-references. At the moment, we simply use the
+                       xref information for every entry, rather than listing the xref separately and
+                       then referencing it. That should not be terribly hard, but it would take a bit
+                       of work.
+               - A third issue concerns the labels. At present, we use the BibTeX key as the 
+                       citation label. It would not be too hard, I think, to use numerical labels,
+                       in the way BibTeX does. To do so, we'd need to move the sorting routine out
+                       of InsetBibtex so we could do it before we print the citations. See below.
        InsetBox: The CSS isn't there yet.
        InsetCitation: This has two limitations as of 11 VI 2009. The first is that we
                ignore the citation style and output square brackets, no matter what. The
@@ -58,9 +64,6 @@ These do not yet work and need some attention:
                about export formats, etc, to get it completely right. We'll also want to make
                some use of the params, eg, on width and height. I guess there is also some
                issue about converting the graphics formats?
-       InsetInclude: I think we just want to include it, straightforwardly. Probably will
-               base this more on the latex() routine, then. Another possibility, maybe with a
-               flag of some sort, would be to do it as a separate file, to which we link.
        InsetRef: Presumably, this is an internal link. But what should the text be, and how
                should we get it? Probably some validation thing again, where labels tell us where 
                they are. Alternatively, we could parse the aux file.