-// FIXME: Unfortunately operator!=(ParIterator &, ParIterator &) is implemented with
-// operator!=(DocIterator &, DocIterator &) that gives false if the positions
-// are different, even if the pars are the same. So ultimately it's a bug in
-// operator!=(ParIterator &, ParIterator &) I'd say (nevertheless, I would be
-// reluctant to change it, because I fear that some part of the code could rely on
-// this "bug". --Alfredo
-bool operator!=(ParIterator const & iter1, ParIterator const & iter2);
+// FIXME: Unfortunately operator!=(ParIterator &, ParIterator &) is
+// implemented with operator!=(DocIterator &, DocIterator &) that gives
+// false if the positions are different, even if the pars are the same.
+// So ultimately it's a bug in operator!=(ParIterator &, ParIterator &)
+// I'd say (nevertheless, I would be reluctant to change it, because I
+// fear that some part of the code could rely on this "bug". --Alfredo
+//bool operator!=(ParIterator const & it1, ParIterator const & it2);