- second is that, with BibTeX, we simply use the BibTeX key as the citation
- string, thus ignoring numerical, author-year, etc. It will not be too hard
- to make numerical work. To do this, we need to collect information on the
- used citations, alphabetize them, and then assign numerical labels via the
- BibTeXInfo::label() method. A similar strategy will work for author-year and
- the like, but calculating labels will be more complex---unless we just parse
- the bbl file, which of course is the only fully general solution.
+ second is that we only do numerical citations. It will not be terribly hard
+ to do author-year citations, but the complexLabel() routine in InsetCitation
+ will need adapting before that is possible.
+ InsetFlex: I think this one is OK, but it needs some testing.
+ InsetFloat: This seems to work OK, but it will need testing and tweaking. There is
+ also no CSS yet for these.
+ InsetFloatList: Seems to work well, but may need testing.
+ InsetGraphics: This works in a pretty primitive way, in that it outputs the graphic
+ and appropriate img tag. But we don't yet do any sort of scaling, rotating, and
+ so forth. That won't be hard, since we can just call ImageMagick to do this for
+ us, but appropriate routines will need to be written.
+ InsetRef: At present, we just use the label name as associated text, and put it
+ into square brackets. It'd be nice to be able to do more, but for that we'd need to
+ associate counters with the labels, and we don't have that yet.
+ InsetTabular: Works reasonably well, but we don't do anything with any of the
+ arguments provided for longtable. There are probably other limitations, too,
+ since I'm very much not an expert with tables.